prohiphop - hip hop marketing and business news


ProHipHop
New Rap Albums
PR: Hip Hop ~ R&B ~ Arts/Fashion ~ Music Industry
Hip Hop Research
Hip Hop @ Netweed
prohiphop.mobi
twitter/prohiphop
subscribe: feedblitz



PROHIPHOP LINKS

About/Contact

Advertise

Archives

Guest Writers & Features

Jobs

Jango Jukebox

News/Links

Privacy Policy

ProHipHop.mobi

Search

Sub: Email/IM/Skype

Sub: RSS/Atom Feed

Sub: Twitter


Add ProHipHop
Headlines to Your
Site or Blog:
Widgetbox
ProHipHop Network

rap1.mobi

ThugLifeArmy.com
Hip-Hop News Plus Tupac Shakur Info


LIL WAYNE'S THE CARTER DOCUMENTARY DVD ON SALE NOW!

Google
 

« Billboard Conference: Declaring Independence | Main | Four Brothers No. 1, Hustle & Flow No. 17 »

August 15, 2005

PR Week on Adidas/Reebok Branding

As previously discussed at ProHipHop, the merger of Adidas and Reebok has raised many questions regarding branding, which seems to be at the heart of the challenges faced by the merged companies.

Late last week, PR Week ran a piece by Keith O'Brien about the ongoing branding discussion related to the merger. Apparently the discussion has been a positive for Adidas and they maintain the brands will remain distinctive.

What most interested me was that the folks quoted by O'Brien focused on the hip hop related identity of the two shoemakers, including quotes from Agenda Inc.'s Lucien James who identifies Reebok as a "new school" hip hop brand and Adidas as an "old school" brand:
“The new school versus old school split between Reebok and Adidas is an obvious distinction . . . The spokespeople should certainly be picked to mark out the differentiators between the brands.”

O'Brien continues with distinctions that I assume come from James:
"The difference between the two hip-hop ideologies are not easily definable, but old school conveys an respect for the history of hip-hop, for taking pride in the quality of their music, and for focusing on substance more than style. New school hip-hop generally focuses on depictions of violence or the amount of individual rapper’s wealth and the artist’s popularity, rather than one’s ability to craft great music. Missy Elliott, an Adidas enthusiast, resides in the old-school tradition, whereas Jay-Z and 50 Cent represent the new school of wealth and 'gangsta' lifestyle."

According to O'Brien, Lucien James maintains "that there are various ways to contrast the brands: old school versus contemporary, fashion versus performance, high-end versus low-end. Techniques may include using limited editions and exploring different distribution channels. The limited editions have worked well for Reebok through its S. Carter . . . and G-Unit lines."

However, "Joseph Anthony, CEO of Vital Marketing, warns that Reebok has done more to elevate the brands of its partners than itself," which is an interesting point. Certainly 50 Cent's Rbk campaigns seem to have built more buzz around 50 Cent than around Rbk but that's a fairly superficial impression on my part.

Anthony also reveals that he wonders "how much traction they’re getting with these brands . . . Reebok is starting to loose its cache as a performance brand and quickly becoming more as a lifestyle brand. Being anchored to these celebrities, it will constantly have to find the next hot person.”

Note: Article found via the Agenda Inc. Live Feed which is an excellent news source if you're interested in trends and marketing.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf66b53ef00d8351d996f53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference PR Week on Adidas/Reebok Branding:


Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.


Please Submit All Publicity Materials to: hiphoppress(at) netweed(dot)com

Additional Guidelines


RINGTONES

Newsfeeds:
ProHipHop: Business
Hip Hop Press
Business Matters Mix
Sneakers & Fashion
Urban Gossip/Rumors
Hip Hop Blogs:
World Cypher