Marketing Lessons from the Grateful Dead: Musical Masters of Building With Their Community


Marketing Lessons from the Grateful Dead

Marketing Lessons from the Grateful Dead by David Meerman Scott and Brian Halligan

Though I think the off-kilter cover art above for Marketing Lessons from the Grateful Dead is simply slackness on the part of some wack employee at Wiley, one could imagine that it indicates the Grateful Dead's somewhat skewed version of reality in the eyes of mainstream America, though that ultimately changed as they helped alter American culture.

[Update: I've been told by the authors that the off-center nature of the poster image is intended to look like it was a real life poster posted somewhere.  As I note in the comments, that doesn't work because it's on a white background so the context they're trying to evoke is absent.  It may work on a book cover, but I think you really need a bit of background to show that it's a flyer posted over other flyers or something similar that evokes a context to make that work.  It certainly doesn't work on the web with a white background surrounded by perfectly rectangular forms.  I haven't seen the book so I can't speak to the experience of seeing the cover in the context of a physical environment.]

In any case, David Meerman Scott and Brian Halligan present their look at the Grateful Dead's success as the "Most Compelling Case Study in the History of Social Media and Inbound Marketing". If you ever went to a Dead show or got a sense of how the scene operated, you probably understand where the authors are coming from. Some of the concepts they present include (from the press release):

Rethink traditional industry assumptions
Rather than focus on record albums as a primary revenue source (with touring to support album sales), the Dead created a business model focused on touring. Halligan and Scott apply that idea to today’s Internet – where the cost of distribution of electronic information is zero. Now, entire new opportunities emerge for those willing to challenge established business models. The Grateful Dead teaches us that business model innovation is frequently more important than product innovation.

Turn your customers into evangelists
Unlike nearly every other band, the Grateful Dead not only encouraged concertgoers to record their live shows, they actually established "taper sections" where fans' equipment could be set up for the best sound quality. When nearly every other band said "no" the Grateful Dead created a huge network of people who traded tapes in pre-Internet days. The broad exposure led to millions of new fans and sold tickets to the live shows. Today, as many companies experiment with offering valuable content on the Web, the Grateful Dead teaches us that when we free our content, more people hear about our company and eventually do business with us.

Bypass accepted channels and go direct
The Grateful Dead created a mailing list in the early 1970s where they announced tours to fans first. Later, they established their own ticketing office, providing the most loyal fans with the best seats in the house. The Grateful Dead teaches us that building a community and treating customers with care and respect drives passionate loyalty.

Build a huge, loyal following
The Grateful Dead let their audience define the Grateful Dead experience. Concerts were a happening, a destination where all 20,000 or more audience members were actually part of the experience. Making fans an equal partner in a mutual journey, the Grateful Dead teaches us that our community defines who we are. In an era of instant communications on Twitter, blogs and the like, we learn that companies cannot force a mindset on their customers.

Their point about the Grateful Dead's willingness to work with their fans who taped live shows is an important one. Deadheads from back in the day will tell you just how cool that could get with all sorts of stories about sneaking equipment into coliseums who banned tapers even for Dead shows and then, once inside, having free reign to tape. There have been occasions where the sound people let someone plug right into the system. And those tapes got passed around (and still are) and now are much more readily available online but, basically, they were the bread and water of the movement, keeping people connected and wanting to see more shows.

This wouldn't work with other bands so easily because the Dead's repertoire was huge (I keep saying and will continue to say was because everything changed after Jerry Garcia, no disrespect intended to the rest of the group, but that's how it is) and involved a great deal of improvisation so that different versions of songs could vary much more widely than one typically encounters from other bands.

But I think I'm correct in saying that the Dead did not initially support tapers based on what I was told by a Deadhead that was pretty deep in the game. I could be wrong but I think it's comparable to the way that Twitter users have created many innovations on Twitter that the company has since made official, like the use of hashtags and so forth, but that was a community move which the companies (Dead & Twitter) were smart enough to follow.

You should note that the text above from the authors tends to phrase things as if the Dead created the community.  Many Deadheads will tell you that, though the musicians were in charge of the music, the community actually created many key aspects of the Grateful Dead phenomenon.  But that's still pretty tough for folks to wrap their heads around for some reason.

Should be a very interesting book that, if it's as good as the authors claim, will help enable marketers to remember that humans have always been social and that the web has simply enabled certain aspects of that sociability in a manner that also facilitates marketers accessing communities with modes other than advertising.

Bonus Bumper Sticker:
Who Are The Grateful Dead?
And Why Do They Keep Following Me?

Available on Amazon:
Marketing Lessons from the Grateful Dead

Over at Hip Hop Press:
Marketing Lessons from the Grateful Dead by David Meerman Scott and Brian Halligan

Comments

  1. Clyde – I love this. Many thanks for writing about it.
    Your point of the community creating the vibe and the journey is correct. While we did emphasize that in the book, perhaps we did make it seem more like the Dead did it. Your Twitter analogy is a great one.
    However, every action they took was for the community and not for their own profit or that of record companies and promoters.
    The bonus bumper sticker is classic. Another: “Q: What did the Deadhead say when she ran out of dope? A” This music sucks.”
    The cover, of course, is a take off on 1970s style poster art. I’ll pass on your love to my friends at Wiley.
    Take care and thanks again.
    David

  2. Clyde Smith says:

    Glad to hear your notes on community and I can see how doing a summary of key takeaways might not be so nuanced. I’m looking forward to seeing what you guys did with it because, after writing the above, I was flooded with relevant memories, particularly hearing about the entrepreneurial parking lot scene and people that made living off it.
    I like the poster art. Is it supposed to be off center? That was my critical point. It looks like it got mis-scanned or something before being distributed.

  3. Thanks for writing your thoughts up. I’d love to hear what you have to say after having a chance to read the book itself.
    You’ve picked up a new reader today.
    Brian
    Co-author of the book.

  4. Clyde Smith says:

    Glad to hear it. Wish I was still doing a lot of writing like this for readers like you!

  5. Clyde, the cover is a takeoff on a 1970s poster designed by hippies and pasted up by hand on a wall somewhere. It is skewed on purpose. But we are considering making it straight when we go back for another printing.
    David

  6. Clyde Smith says:

    But do you see how, by having a white background, that makes it incredibly ambiguous?
    If the background indicated this poster was posted on something, it would be obvious, but because it’s white, there’s no context to recognize that it’s not a mistake.
    By the way, I love old posters, flyers, graphics that give one a feel for the time, so I don’t dislike the graphic itself, I just think without seeing it on a cover or with a background that indicates it’s not just an image of a flyer but an image of a flyer posted a bit skewed, it’s confusing in a non-productive manner.

  7. Doug Eymer says:

    Clyde:
    I designed the cover, as well as the entire book–with David Meerman Scott and the good folks at Wiley.
    The 2º tilt of the poster was intentional, if for nothing more, than to visually demonstrate the organic essence of the band. I felt that placing the poster perfectly centered, would not be accurately depicting the Grateful Dead’s brand DNA.
    I truly appreciate the fact that you disagree. Most of all, I am so very pleased with the dialog that you have initiated. In stirring the pot of opinions, I feel as though I have done my job successfully.
    Doug Eymer | doug@eymer.com | http://www.eymer.com

  8. Clyde Smith says:

    “In stirring the pot of opinions, I feel as though I have done my job successfully.”
    I guess, like T-Pain, all you do is win!
    Thanks for dropping by. Maybe you’re not so wack after all. [lol]