I seem to be in one of those headspaces where I need to respond to some hip hop media coverage with points that may not concern most people. So this is for the record regarding hip hop and academia.
Since hip hop in academia is on a growth curve, meaning we're going to hear more opinions about academic research from those untrained in research, I want to address Davey D's take on his academic experience as presented in a recent SF Chronicle article:
When hip-hop journalist and former emcee Davey D, a.k.a. David Cook, turned in his undergraduate thesis titled "The Power of Rap" in 1987, he didn't think he had a problem with sources.
"I handed it in with no footnotes," he remembers in a phone interview, "and my professor was like, 'Cool. This is good but there aren't any footnotes. You need footnotes.' I mean, I'm talking about something I was a part of, something I knew a lot about, and he was like, 'Footnote something. There's got to be books about hip-hop.' "
But there really weren't any source books on the subject, so Cook the student ended up footnoting emcee Davey D -- himself -- as someone who had been quoted in Bomb magazine.
What bothers me here, beyond the fact that undergrads aren't taught anything about research and pickup phrases like "footnote something" without ever really understanding why, is that the teacher obviously hadn't discussed the likelihood of there being significant coverage that wasn't in books.
The writer of the article relates the point that "there really weren't any source books on the subject" as if that mattered. Citations can be to anything and, depending on the discipline and the level of knowledge of the teacher, can include one's own experiences, emails, etc, though citing personal experience was not so acceptable in the late 80s and remains unacceptable to those uninformed of historical advances in qualitative research.
Citations simply tell you where something came from and have never been limited to books because a lot of important research never makes it to book form. It's all academic journals and direct conversation for serious researchers wanting to know the state of the art.
But the fact that Davey D is saying the only thing he had is Bomb in 1987 [which is a little hard to believe] suggests that the teacher did an even bigger disservice by not introducing Davey to basic library reference tools for periodicals. If the teacher had, Davey D would have found the treasure trove of early hip hop culture coverage that emerged in the Village Voice very early on and that was informing me in North Carolina via a subscription throughout the 80s.
There are a lot of interesting issues related to hip hop and academia but I'm afraid that most journalistic coverage will stop at the stereotypes of what academia and research are all about without ever knowing what's actually going on.
Key Point:
Davey D didn't really need a book about hip hop to cite a book based source useful in a research paper about hip hop. So, let's assume that his undergrad thesis The Power of Rap spoke to issues like the political content in the lyrics or the exciting experience of a live show.
A useful source for considering the political content of hip hop lyrics might include books on political poetry, for example, in the 1980s there was a revolution in Nicaragua and all sorts of stuff making the news. When the Sandinistas took power, they installed many artists and writers in important positions typically held by professional politicians. This was widely reported in the news and I bought numerous books about the situation discussing how artists were deeply immersed in the nation's revolution.
For a live show approach, there's so much on the power of crowds, live performances, rhythmic group movement, popular dance, etc. that it would have been easy to find something that discussed the elements that made rap a powerful live experience.
So, even in the absence of topically specific material, there is usually a great deal of material that is directly relevant and could even simply be used to generate some references that confirm what you already believe, like most normal people would probably do.
Recent Comments